Read La Religieuse by Denis Diderot Online


XVIIIe siècle. Suzanne Simonin est contrainte par ses parents de prononcer des voeux forcés au terme de son noviciat. Pour de prétendues raisons financières, ceux-ci ont préféré enfermer leur fille au couvent. Mais en réalité, c'est parce qu'elle est un enfant illégitime et que sa mère espère ainsi expier sa faute de jeunesse. À son arrivée, elle rencontre la supérieure deXVIIIe siècle. Suzanne Simonin est contrainte par ses parents de prononcer des voeux forcés au terme de son noviciat. Pour de prétendues raisons financières, ceux-ci ont préféré enfermer leur fille au couvent. Mais en réalité, c'est parce qu'elle est un enfant illégitime et que sa mère espère ainsi expier sa faute de jeunesse. À son arrivée, elle rencontre la supérieure de Moni, avec qui elle se lie d'amitié. Mais celle-ci perd la foi avant de mourir. Arrive alors une nouvelle supérieure : Sainte-Christine. Lorsqu'elle apprend que Suzanne désire rompre ses vœux, la supérieure opère un véritable harcèlement moral et physique sur Suzanne. Désormais, la vie de la pauvre novice est faite de brimades et d'humiliations permanentes…...

Title : La Religieuse
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 9782080701770
Format Type : Unknown Binding
Number of Pages : 246 Pages
Status : Available For Download
Last checked : 21 Minutes ago!

La Religieuse Reviews

  • Lisa
    2019-06-09 16:59

    I used to talk to Diderot!Seriously! He was my first literary crush, and the first author who inspired me without exception. From my very first encounter with him at university, I was captivated by the lively, humorous intellectual giant, who could juggle the Enlightenment questions while being social, human, and incredibly funny. I sat in the attic of our university library, where the whole Encyclopédie was arranged and remained rather untouched for decades on end. And I read random articles penned by Diderot, and laughed with the ghosts of wit past. For I could not find any living person who put so much energy and charm into loving literature, justice and life. Had Diderot been a contemporary of ours, he would spread bliss on Goodreads, I am sure. And probably, he would be a Goodreads librarian as well, reviewing non-existent books for fun, hoping for stupid pseudo-erudite comments from flatterers (and I would be one of them, maybe!).For Diderot knew how to spread Fake News long before they made the real news and became an epidemic in the fake world of 2016. “La Religieuse” came into being as a practical joke played on a friend, a fake story supported by fake letters. What a grandiose time Diderot and his friends must have had, coming up with the procedure to make a mutual friend engage in support of a fugitive nun, who had been forced into a monastery against her will. In the end, they were very sad to have to kill her off, as a meeting between the real friend and the literary heroine was imminent. Che drama!However, even though the text derives from a made-up story, and was created with the intention to play a trick on a friend, it would be entirely wrong to dismiss its message as a Don Quixotesque joke. For that is how Diderot got his message across: he disguised serious matters behind a curtain of silly adventures, exaggerations and inconsistencies. To be taken seriously, he made fun of the world. And that is what I find so incredibly compelling in him. My whole personality bows to the man who saw the injustice and idiocy of the world around him, but still found pleasure and amusement enough to be witty, not bitter.Certainly, the misery of monastery life and its social implications is exaggerated in “La Religieuse”, or condensed to one story. For there were numerous cases of young girls forced by parents to become nuns, for social or pecuniary reasons. And there were trials that were lost. There were reports of cruelty and bullying, as well as sexual obsessions and abuse. Diderot collected the different experiences of monastery life and put them all together in the consecutive adventures of his protagonist in different monasteries. It is not very likely that one person would have experienced all of that, but all those abuses were common. The interesting argument in the short novel, however, is not the inhumanity of the inhabitants of monasteries, and their meaningless, shallow rituals, but the reason why the young woman doesn’t want to stay there. She can’t expect to have a life in splendor anywhere else either, in fact. She will have to work hard, subject to all kinds of insecurities, and male violence. But she insists that she can’t be made to live in a monastery, for she is not suited for it: she wants her freedom, la liberté, and the monastery is a symbol for parental, religious and state dominance over individuals’ natural inclinations and instincts. The story criticises four elements of French society:The State that lets religious institutions take over such a big share of decision making regarding the liberty of its citizensThe Church that provides a system in which it earns money from withdrawing young people from active, social lifeThe Society that provides a moral code which allows for punishment of illegitimate children rather than their parentsThe Catholic dogma that is inconsistent, confusing and outrageously evil in some respectsTo me, the most shocking part was reading the “harmless” dialogues between the main character and different devout family members and nuns. I found it hard to understand that they actually believed they would “meet in heaven”, - that they would “sit down and talk” about the people they knew on Earth. When the protagonist is seriously ill, one of the nuns in her monastery laments that she is going to meet her favourite friend in heaven:“And what is she going to tell her about me?” Going to heaven to gossip about others? What?Or the unfaithful mother, who pushes her child into a monastery, so that she can redeem herself in heaven. Utterly bizarre. What kind of a deity is that, who would punish a (dead) sinner if the (living) offspring doesn’t behave?"Songez, mon enfant, que le sort de votre mère, dans l'autre monde, dépend beaucoup de la conduite que vous tiendrez dans celui-ci: Dieu, qui voit tout, m'appliquera, dans sa justice, tout le bien et tout le mal que vous ferez."Reading Diderot sharpened my eyes and ears in this area, and I was completely taken aback when my finishing of the book coincided with the sudden deaths of two celebrities, and the news that one of them had “her stroke because she wanted to go and care for her deceased daughter”. What kind of care does her daughter need, if she is in that obscure place called heaven? Bizarre rationalisations still very much alive among human beings who can’t imagine that their influence on others will ever cease. That life is over when it’s over. We still need to think that we are needed, that we can watch over the world and gossip about it, that we will meet again, in a strangely familiar setting (where?). Diderot pointed it out with stunning accuracy, when he reflected that people invoke gods and devils and heavens and hells according to their current needs, without logic:“Il me paraissait assez singulier que la même chose vînt de Dieu ou du diable, selon qu'il leur plaisait de l'envisager. Il y a beaucoup de circonstances pareilles dans la religion; et ceux qui m'ont consolée m'ont souvent dit de mes pensées, les uns que c'étaient autant d'instigations de Satan, et les autres, autant d'inspirations de Dieu. Le même mal vient, ou de Dieu qui nous éprouve, ou du diable qui nous tente.”I strongly recommend reading “La Religieuse” as the perfect case for personal freedom, against prejudice and patented dogma. We need Diderot’s clear vision more than ever!But I will close with another favourite of mine, reflecting on the strange group of people who all aspire to a place in that heavenly, gossiping beehive.As Oscar Wilde said: “I don’t want to go to heaven. None of my friends are there!” Just think about it! The Who’s Who In Heaven is a scary read!

  • Lynne King
    2019-06-08 17:41

    “So you’re not going to come to see me anymore?”“No, dear Mother.”“And you won’t let me come and see you in your cell anymore?”“No, dear Mother.”“Will you refuse my caresses?”“It will be very difficult for me to do so, for I was born affectionate and I like being caressed, but I must. I’ve promised my confessor and I made a vow before the altar.”Looking at the above, is that the normal conversation between a nun and her mother superior? Perhaps it was at that particular time?On that note, where do you possibly start with even attempting to write a review on any work by this exceptional 18th century French author and philosopher?Diderot has indeed excelled himself here. He was a leading literary figure and believed that people generally needed to socialize and he seemed to think it quite unhealthy that individuals could even contemplate withdrawing from society. So it seems to be at the opposite end of the spectrum that he would write this 1770 novella (posthumously published in 1796 – he evidently was never in a hurry to get his written works to the public) against a backdrop of girls, as young as fifteen, who were forced by their parents to take their perpetual vows for life in the claustrophobic atmosphere of the convents. In addition, what intrigued me more than anything about Diderot was that he was both an atheistic and a materialist, and yet he’s written a religious book and a satire at that. And to think that this book started as a hoax on a good friend:“I have learned, written as a hoax: the purpose was initially to lure Marc-Antoine-Nicholas Croismare, Marquis of Lasson, back to Paris. Following the death of his wife, Suzanne Davy de La Pailleterie (a relation of Alexandre Dumas), the Marquis quit Paris and stayed away for eight years, during which time he had taken interest in the real life case of Marguerite Delamarre, who had claimed that, like the narrator of The Nun Suzanne Simonin, she was forced to take her vows against her will. Diderot, along with his friends, decided to trick the Marquis into returning, and the letters, turned into the novel, were purported to be from Suzanne, appealing to the Marquis for help.”Unfortunately this all backfired, as the Marquis was not to be lured back and the issuance of this book subsequently took a different turn in its retelling.In my naivety, I believed that nuns typified godliness, devoutness, modesty and kindness, amongst other things, but what do we have here in this remarkable work? Well nothing except nuns who are portrayed as conniving, murderous in thought, violent, lying and with a penchant for lesbian sexual pursuits. The contradictory aspect is that despite all of this, they are also very naïve and emotionally/sexually vulnerable. I was amused nevertheless to see how licentious mother superiors could bring these impressionable young girls round to their way of thinking. Some form of religious hysteria I guess. I was disappointed nonetheless at the lack of bondage (that was sad) but at least I had the evidence of several pieces of rope to encourage me in this vague possibility.Sister Suzanne supposedly appears not to really understand (methinks that’s highly unlikely) the tame advances (and are they tame – there’s no leaping or bounding around with passion) made towards her by her new mother superior. Well it’s all rather unfortunate for the nuns in the convent that a certain confessor gets involved in the act with our sister and then everything escalates completely out of control…I found the use of the first person as the narrator a powerful tool for describing the plight of these unfortunate girls. Most had their own dowries to pay for their time spent in the convents (few ever left before the laws were changed) but we also have the all-pervading atmosphere of pre-revolutionary France where the King had the right to sign “lettres de cachet”, whereupon an individual could be tossed into jail, or in this case, a convent without any recourse whatsoever. These letters “contained orders directly from the king, often to enforce arbitrary actions and judgments that could not be appealed.”This book set my thought processes reeling from one of comedy and laughter through to black humour and tragedy and when I finished the last page, I smiled and in fact I was even tempted to laugh out loud at Diderot’s writing. Perhaps I was on the verge of hysteria. Weren’t nuns supposed to suffer from hysteria?On one hand, there’s the violence demonstrated by the nuns and mother superior towards the supposedly reserved and innocent Sister Suzanne, who, on the other hand, basically seems to enjoy most aspects of her lifestyle at the three convents she stays in even though she’s going through the “wars”. On the surface she appears to remain mentally, not physically, untouched by everything that happens to her. Our sister is a survivor and I always have a very high regard for that type of individual, be it in life or in a novel such as this.And as for Suzanne’s mother; could one really believe her story about her daughter’s birth or was it all contrived?The letters written by “the likeable and ill-fated Sister Suzanne Saulier (known as Simonin in the story and in this correspondence)” to the Marquis and his replies are edifying and then what does he do, but throw a spanner in the works. And the letters of Madame Madin all add spice to the tale.I don’t know what it is that I find fascinating about nuns, monks and monasteries but I do. One of those mysteries of life I guess.On that final note, all I can say is that I adored this book and look forward to reading more books by this remarkable man.

  • Ahmad Sharabiani
    2019-06-17 19:48

    ‭La religieuse = Memoirs of a Nun, Denis Diderotتاریخ خوانش: پیش از سال 1977 میلادیعنوان: راهبه؛ نویسنده: دنی دیدرو؛ مترجم: گیورگیس آقاسی؛ تهران، انتشارات پدیده؛ ؟؛ جیبی، موضوع: داستانهای نویسندگان فرانسوی - قرن 18 معنوان: راهبه؛ نویسنده: دنی دیدرو؛ مترجم: قاسم صنعوی؛ تهران، فرهنگ جاوید؛ 1394؛ در 272 ص؛ شایک: 9786006182704؛ کتاب را سالها پیش از امروز خوانده ام اما داستانش یادم نیست، در ویکیپدیای ورژن انگلیسی راجع به همین کتاب مطالبی نوشته است که در ریویوهای عربی و انگیسی گودریدز نیز هست. ا. شربیانی

  • MJ Nicholls
    2019-06-11 00:01

    I’m applying for positions of paid work at the moment (known as a “job”—so I’m told), and after about a month of no replies I’m about ready to sign up for the convent. I would love to be a nun! Provided I had computer and broadband access, and was permitted to read any book I so pleased, I’d put on my habit and sing the sacraments! Unfortunately all the nun positions are filled at the moment, despite me faking three months nunning experience on my CV. (I’m considering changing the name on my CV to Jeffrey Archer, since everything else on there is made up—British joke, Google the bestselling turd). This book is amazing! Diderot is such a fiendishly funny satirist, wiping the floor with all his 18thC cronies. The Nun takes us from a sadistic convent regime of starving and torture into a sumptuous world of desirous shephebes (my coinage—hire me someone!), in breathless first-person prose: excellent rhythm, pacing and plotting. And a wee bit titillating. The book was originally orchestrated as a hoax, which makes me love Diderot even more.

  • Frona
    2019-06-17 16:47

    Through the halls and cells of a convent, guarded by high walls and austere religious customs, we follow a young nun making arrangements to escape a future that was imposed on her. She has a knack for logic and no ear for vocation, so she is not able to find any justification for all the suffering and pious rules that govern her. In her fight for freedom she uses all the means of revolt there are: open protest, rigid obedience, lawsuit, relocation etc. Embracing her destiny is not a viable alternative and even an ungodly reader prays with her that it will not become one.The church’s aberrations are rarely so vividly coloured as in the journey of this nun, who happens to find herself surrounded by odd habits of nunneries and can’t make sense of them. Our habits and rituals may seem ridiculous to an outside observer, all the more so, when there is no reason behind them. She is as close to a spring of meaning as it gets and everything she encounters forces her to drink from it: old traditions, that must have some sense to have lasted for so long and to be so highly respected; the lives of fellow nuns that must be meaningful in some way. Nevertheless she finds none for herself and remains detached. There’s no hidden, internal logic of such a closed system, just an obliviousness to the general laws of the world.Although this novel is an epitome of all the wrongdoings of religious institutions to a degree that it made me laugh, I still felt a bit cheated by the final twist; but in a most charming way there is. I wanted to go back in time when stories emerged in passing and there was still as much effort put in personal pursuits as it was in professional ones… If, of course, such a time ever existed and it was not reserved for the chosen few who might as well be living today.

  • Anthony Vacca
    2019-06-12 01:04

    Wowzers! how I loved this book. At face value, this is a slim and straight-forward epistolary novel about a young woman who is forced into covenant life by her awful, self-absorbed parents, who then proceeds to stand firm to her ideals as she is antagonized by sadistic, power-hungry hypocrites and mentally disturbed sex fiends. While Diderot was very much an atheist, he does a praiseworthy turn here giving voice to a sincerely religious narrator that has no desire to live the claustrophobic and tedious life of a nun. Not so much an attack against religion as much as an attack on the socially constructed institution of religion, Diderot weaves subtle and sublime satire into his novel, making it not only a potent lashing of the people who misuse religion as a means of taking out their petty, insensible vengeance on the world, but also a melancholy cry of empathy for the men and women who find themselves trapped in the repressed, anti-physical hologram that is the lifestyle of the insanely devout. Bonus points for Diderot's generous characterizations of the complexities of gender roles waaay before there was any modern idea such as lesbianism...and that ending...oh that ending! An act of pre-modern postmodern genius or just a helluva twist, take your pick. Read this book.

  • Jonfaith
    2019-06-25 22:43

    Man was born to live with his fellow human beings. Separate him, isolate him, his character will go bad, a thousand ridiculous affects will invade his heart, extravagant thoughts will germinate in his brain, like thorns in an uncultivated land.Given the untimely arrival of our Arctic Vortex, it is fitting that The Nun shudders with a frozen despair. Bone chilling mornings are well suited for such guided tours of the dark side. Abandon your preconceptions of the Enlightenment and moral cautionary tales, Diderot's creation is terrifying. Apparently it was a practical joke used to trick a friend to return to Paris from the countryside. The novel takes the form of an escaped nun tracing her history in a lengthy letter about a series of convents, ones where the prevailing theme is obedience. One thinks of Martin Amis, "give some someone absolute control over another and thoughts soon turn to torture." Forget Sade or Huysmans, I was scared shitless by the novel's second Mother Superior: think Martha Stewart as Torquemada.

  • knig
    2019-06-15 22:54

    This went down in one sitting: less a tribute to the literary merits of this novel and more an expose of my coarse, voyeuristic nature. Of the very base, chav chasing, track suit wearing, Vicky Pollard yeah but no but yeah variety where I settle my newly acquired Christmas overhang on the settee, spread out the fries and Baconnaise washed down with a spot of bitter shandy and munch my way through this epic saga of nuns being very, very naughty. In France. And, lets face it, nobody does naughty like the French (except maybe Berlusconi and the Bunga Bunga parties. Which I only know about through hearsay because I’m no longer a minor and therefore was not invited). The picture I paint above is ofcourse, exactly the kind of parody I used to laugh over with my mates in college: the beached whale with the mills&boon tucked under one arm, and the tub of Hagendaaz in the other at the supermarket checkout, getting ready to spread her mutton-dressed as lamb buttmuch on the sofa for a Friday night staycation. Well, whose laughing now. Wait, that came out wrong, like a bad Bushism. I mean, except, I’m not laughing anymore. Still, Diderot gives a lot more bang for my buck than Mills & Boon, so some mercies abound.So, theres a pubescent girl Suzanne who is thrown into a convent in 1758 in a process called ‘coerced monachization’ (no Diderot didn’t use this phrase. No, I didn’t come up with it either. No, it has nothing to do with monage, ménage or any variation thereof. Some academic did to explain the fact that up to half of all patrician females (thats the nobility to you and me) were voluntarily-on-purpose left in these convents against their will). Once inside, Suzanne is subjected to all kinds of debauchery, torture, sexual harassment, incarceration, and basically any degrading acts you can think of. And some you can’t. So, there I am, eating, reading, reading, eating, unable to stop, because I have GOT to know just how far that pesky mother Superior is going to take her ‘dangerous liaison’: we have a slow progression from holding hands, to kissing the eyelids, the neck, the shoulders (and orgasming fully clothed at this point which was surprising yet reminiscent of a Bikram kind of mind over matter way. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was offered as extra credit course somewhere: How to orgasm fully clothed and at arms length from the object of your affection).So, as all of this action (or inaction, depending on your point of view) was developing, I did get this slightly uncomfortable snapshotty feeling of reading this novel for all the wrong reasons: namely a vacuous mesmerisation (is that a word?) with this 18c French Big Brother reality show. The torture, the cruelty, the petty shenanigans of a bunch of sexually frustrated and extremely bored nuns. I say all the wrong reasons because the novel was/is meant to be so much more than raunchy tell all. Its actually a scathing indictment of a despicable practice of forcibly ‘interring’ superfluous daughters in perpetual oblivion within the walls of these positively heathenish convents. And once you were in, you were in. Breaking the vows was impossible. Que desolee.But I’ll admit, thats not why I was reading it. I was reading it to see how bad those nuns could get.

  • Rowena
    2019-06-21 18:47

    This is an interesting novella, written in the form of a letter, by a nun to someone she hopes will help her break the vows which she took by force.The young French girl, Suzanne, is a victim of circumstances, hated by her family through no fault of her own, and forced to enter a convent. She takes the orders against her wishes although she realizes she has no vocation.At the convent she falls into the bad books of the Mother Superior and is abused horrifically, sadistically even. Some of the methods the nuns used to abuse her were pretty shocking. The book is not an attack on Catholicism by any means; Suzanne never loses her faith despite her ordeals. What it is is an attack on the “unnatural” atmosphere of a cloister. It brings to the forefront the awful practice of forcing young girls into convents, often when they were as young as 15 (too young to really know what was going on). Truly, Diderot paints convent life in the most awful way. The convent conditions sound dreadful and don’t seem to be conducive to growth or anything remotely positive. As Suzanne said, "I have plenty of courage, but no courage in the world can hold out in the face of neglect, solitude and persecution."I think it was an interesting read for me as I had always assumed that convents wouldn’t be such places of pettiness, and that relations between nuns would be civil at least. Alas, this was not the case in this book.

  • K.D. Absolutely
    2019-06-20 00:47

    Funny classic novel about a nun! This novel was originally written as a joke! And a joke it should be read and enjoyed! La Religieuse (The Nun) is an 18th century French novel, by Denis Diderot. Completed in c. 1780, the work, however, wasn't published until 1796, after Diderot's death. Diderot wrote a letter to his retired companion Marquis de Croismare to entice him to retreat back to Paris. The letter was supposed to be from a nun incarcerated in a convent asking Croismare to save her. Many of Diderot's friends found the letters amusing so Diderot revised and made it into a novel. Suzanne was a 19-y/o girl who was the youngest in the family of 3 girls. Her mother had an affair with another man and although Suzanne grew up with her mother's real husband, she felt unloved. When she began to have admirers, her parents brought her to a convent to become a nun. In front of the altar when the priest asked if she wanted to be come a nun, she answered no. Her parents plead to her but she persisted. But they died. So, with nowhere else to go, she finally agreed. However, she still felt trapped and she started to create scenes in the convent. She was punished until a priest transferred her to another convent. In that other convent, she was molested by the Mother Superior. The plot is not funny. Rather, if it were true in the 18th century France (where most people are catholics), it could have created a scandal. Also, learning in the book's introduction that it was supposed to be a joke, I could not help but laugh in many scenes in it. My favorite is that part when after Suzanne was punished by the nuns, she prayed loud to God to forgive her tormentors. The Mother Superior said that she Suzanne compared herself to Jesus Christ and they (the nuns) as the Jews who crucified Him.However, it is also written in Wikipedia that Diderot had a nun sister who died in a French Catholic church from overwork. This was said to have changed his view on religion.Yesterday, I was in Fullybooked Rockwell with my father-in-law. We were celebrating Father's Day together with my family and his wife and our US-based visiting ninang. My father-in-law bought two non-fiction books worth P1,600+. One of them was about WWII and the other one is a book on humor (jokes). He said that he does not read fiction because they are just gawa-gawa ng tao. Unknown to him, I had already bought two books worth P900+: Pnin by my favorite Vladimir Nabokov and At-Swim Two Birds by Flann O'Brien. I retorted that fiction books may have been that but most of them have basis in real life. They are just made into fiction to be more interesting. Non-fiction could also be gawa-gawa so we cannot be sure if they are all true.Like The Nun. We know about those scandals inside the church. Like the valiant story of McArthur or the fake medals of President Marcos that were erroneously written in our history. That episode in Desperate Housewives was not funny at all. Some Filipino doctors in the US even marched on the streets demanding apology from Fox and the producers of the show.I seldom buy regular-priced books. For more than a year now, I have not been buying clothes except those given to me during holidays (Father's Day, my birthday and Christmas) by my family and friends. I have "rainy days" fund. However, I still know how to share and how to enjoy money to bring me happiness. Good friends and books (like The Nun) do make me happy.

  • Joselito Honestly and Brilliantly
    2019-06-16 21:43

    A novel about nun-and-nun lesbian love. In a broader context, about what happens when piety is imposed against one's free will. From his personal experience, Denis Diderot knew it is tragic. His own sister, forced into an Ursuline convent, lost her mind and died there, insane. He himself was once locked up in a monastery by his own father who had wanted him to become a priest. He escaped and instead married his Nanette.This is an 18th century novel and when it was written by this Frenchman Diderot one (1) in every 200 Frenchwomen was a nun. Young, beautiful French girls were being sent to convents against their will for all sorts of reasons (e.g., they're illegitimate, unmarried still and past the age of marrying, etc.). The country then remarkably had more nuns than monks: 5,000 convents with around 55,000 nuns compared to only 3,000 monasteries which were homes to around 30,000 monks. It would have been not much a problem had these nuns and monks been allowed to socialize or interact with each other but these were Catholic nuns and monks so celibacy and chastity were rigid rules--at least on paper. Through a character in the novel Diderot passionately lashes at this system, at these rash, forced and unnatural vows taken by these creatures of the flesh:"Can these vows, which fly in the face of our natural inclinations, ever be properly observed by anyone other than a few abnormal creatures in whom the seeds of passion have withered and whom we should rightly consider as monsters, if the current state of our knowledge allow us to understand the internal structure of man as easily and as well as we understand his external form? Do all those doleful ceremonies that are performed at the taking of the habit and at the profession, when a man or woman is dedicated to the monastic life and to misfortune, actually suspend our animal instincts? On the contrary, are not those very instincts stirred up in the silence, constraint, and idleness, and with a violence unknown to people in the world outside who are swept along by a host of distractions? Where does one see minds obsessed by impure visions which haunt them and torment them? Where does one see that profound boredom, that pallor, and those skeletal forms which are all symptoms of nature languishing and wasting away? Where are the nights troubled by groans and days filled with tears shed needlessly and preceded by some mysterious melancholy? Where does nature, revolted by a constraint for which it is not intended, smash the obstacles put in its way, become enraged, and throw the whole animal system into incurable disarray? Where have spite and whim destroyed all social qualities? ...Where does man, considering himself but an ephemeral, transitory being, treat the sweetest relationships of this world with disinterest, as a traveller treats the things he comes across? Where is the dwelling place of coercion, disgust, and hysteria? Where is the home of servitude and despotism? Where is undying hatred? Where are the passions nurtured in silence? "Indeed, where but in the whole of France was it that nuns kiss each other, mouth-to-mouth, tongues skirmishing, and attaching their country's very name to this delicious intimacy they have invented? Mother Superiors having orgasms while newly entered nuns, fresh and innocent, sat on their laps? Or one, after having touched and praised every part of a young nun's body, who would piously intone:"No, it is the greatest joy that God has called her to the cloistered life; with a figure like that in the outside world she would have driven every man she set her eyes on to damnation, and she would have bee damned with them. All God's ways are just!"

  • ايمان
    2019-06-15 23:53

    خشيت لمدة طويلة اقتحام عالم ديدرو فكما اعلم انه عالم موسوعي فهالني ان اقتحم روايتاه التي قد تكون مغرقة في مفردات غريبة و صعبة..الترجمة العربية شجعتني و لم اندم وروز مخلوف ابدعت بصدق في الترجمة ..الرواية بدأت برسالة مطولة لراهبة تعيش الأمرين بين عائلة قتلتها الاسرار ففضلت الأم تقديم سوزان كقربان للدير علها تكفر عن خطيئتها و بين ثلاث اديرة كل منها كانت له عذاباته التي تنسيها في سابقاتها..سوزان الفتاة المتصالحة مع ذاتها رغم صغر سنها البريئة و التي تعرف بالضبط ما الذي تستطيع تقديمه لله و لنفسها حاربت سجنها داخل الدير بشتى الوسائل و لم تصمت رغم كل العذاب الذي قاسته...ادخلتنا سوزان لعالم كئيب للرهبنة _التي تحرمه ديانتنا الاسلام و ما احكمها ديانة_ عالم من الصرامة المبالغ فيها سجن تحت اسم الرب و اغتيال للمشاعر الدنيوية و اغتصاب للحريات و للاجساد بداعي التقرب من الله ..ديدرو كان حكيما و هو المعروف بكتاباته المحروقة او التي زجت به في السجن فتناول طريقة سرد غريبة قد تقتل الرواية او قد تحييها حسب مزاج القارئ بالنسبة لي اغرمت بالرواية لكني صدمت بآخر قسم فيها كنت افضل لو تغاضى عنه ديدرو و لن اخبر بالكثير حتى لا تفقد الرواية طعمها للقراء..مع ذلك اقول اني ندمت انني أجلت دخول عالم الراهبة سوزان ..قراءة ممتعة

  • mai ahmd
    2019-06-23 22:52

    من الروايات الكلاسيكية الجميلة والتي غفل عنها القارىء العربي بسبب عدم ترجمتها لذلك أوجه تحية لمشروع كلمة للترجمة على مبادرتها الجليلة في أحياء هذا الكتاب وإخراجه للنور .. تدور فكرة الرواية حول راهبة أدخلت قسرا للدير وقدمت نذورها دون رغبة في ذلك مما جعلها تعاني الأمرين لفقدانها حريتها حيث اقترنت لديها فكرة الإنضمام للدير بفكرة العبودية فحاربت بشتى الطرق للحصول على حريتها ، احتقرت تلك الغباوة السعيدة التي تظهر بها زميلاتها والتي يتفاخرن بها لنيل الرضا واعتبرتها تفاهات لايمكن أن تقوم بها ، هذا الإختلاف كلفها غاليا .. الكتاب يسلط الضوء على حياة الأديرة بطريقة الهجاء وكيف ممكن أن يساء استخدام سلطة الدين لرغبات شخصية ومصالح ذاتية وكيف ممكن أن يدفع الناس البسطاء ثمنا غاليا فقط لأنهم رفضوا أن يقولوا نعم حين وجب عليهم أن يقولوا لا كتاب جميل جدا

  • Suvi
    2019-05-28 17:49

    Diderot finished The Nun in 1760, but it wasn't published in book form until 1796, twelve years after Diderot's death. What's interesting about this is that the novel is based on a practical joke played on the Marquis de Croismare. The Marquis had stayed in Normandy for several years, when one day he received a letter, where a young nun asked help after having escaped from a convent. This "nun" was actually Diderot and his friends. The story was believable, because the letter was based on Marguerite Delamarre's case, in which de Croismare had been involved (details here). The joke failed, because the Marquis, instead of returning to Paris, offered the girl a sanctuary in Normandy, so naturally the girl had to be "killed". Surprisingly, after finding out the truth, the Marquis just laughed and didn't mind at all.Diderot then developed his novel from these letters. His sister went mad and died in a convent, and as one of the leading figures of the Enlightenment, a critic of religion, and a defender of women (or at least he was aware that they were treated as children), Diderot's stance on the convent system doesn't come as a surprise.Although, to be more specific, the novel deals with the practice of sending girls to convents against their will for various reasons (Delamarre was three when she began her convent life). Financial difficulties and too many mouths to feed? Off to the convent! Immoral behavior? Off to the convent! Difficult to gather up a dowry, so that your daughter can't get married? Off to the convent! In mid-18th century every 200th Frenchwoman was a nun, and there were double as many convents (5000) and nuns (55 000) than monasteries and monks.Suzanne, the protagonist, is genuinely religious, but she doesn't have a calling to be a nun. Her parents force her into a convent, because she's a consequence from her mother's affair, so her (step)father's and mother's hate and guilt lead to Suzanne feeling like she has a duty to move away from her family's, especially her siblings' who worry about their inheritance, range of vision. In short, she has way too much understanding toward her mother's situation.When Suzanne realizes the truth about convent life, it's already too late. She's forced to suffer from physical abuse and the childish bullying of the nuns and the Mother Superior. A Mother Superior, who brags about how she's able to turn the nuns into monsters at any given moment. It's distressing to read how Suzanne tries to escape her predicament by appealing to outsiders and by getting a lawyer, because the canon law had great weight in 18th century France. An individual, especially a girl, had very little power to decide about their own life. In real cases, the lawyers who appealed on behalf of their clients, drew attention to the women's passiveness, childlikeness, and their inability to make decisions. One case had a monk, and he was described with the same terms, so that he appeared more feminine and pathetic. The society simply considered those who wanted to get out of the convents hysterical and too keen on independence. The vow you made to God was binding, and if you tried to sever that tie, the society's family values were practically about to get destroyed (Convents and Nuns in Eighteenth-century French Politics and Culture by Mita Choudhury).When Suzanne switches convents, her inexperience once again leads to trouble with the Mother Superior, but this time just causes confusion in the girl's naive mind. Diderot addresses women's sexual frustration boldly but not scandalously, and Suzanne isn't unhappy because she lost her loved one, so The Nun isn't comparable to earlier semi-pornographic nun fantasies written by men. I admit thinking about Matthew Gregory Lewis's The Monk (published in the same year) and The Devils (1971) when I first read the synopsis. The Nun, however, is vastly different, because suicidal nuns who tear their hair and go mad mostly just make you sad. There are many similarities with Delamarre's story, but you can find out yourselves what kind of an ending Suzanne has.So far probably the most accessible 18th century novel I've read, but still very thought-provoking and intelligent. Russell Goulbourne's translation is clear and fluent, and the Oxford World's Classics edition has a great introduction with the original letters printed in the appendix. Diderot's criticism of religion is sharp, but he avoids preaching, and instead focuses on Suzanne's thoughts and experiences. There were times when the story lagged quite a bit, because the plot is pretty nonexistent, but that's minor."But where's the danger in one woman's intimacy with and caresses for another woman?"Dom Morel said nothing."Am I not just the same as I was when I came here?"Dom Morel said nothing."Wouldn't I have carried on being the same? So where's the harm in loving one another, in saying so and in showing it? It's so pleasant!"

  • Luís C.
    2019-05-28 17:40

    The Nun, tells the story of a testimonial, inspired Diderot by real events, of a young girl who will go into orders against her.Suzanne, to allow his mother to atone for his sin of adultery (and also to allow her two sisters to receive any inheritance from his parents) will end up in a convent.Despite herself, she pronounced the vows that will devote an entire life in a convent and devoted to prayer and other devotions.She will try to sue in order to break his vows. Unfortunately, we are still at a time when the Church and the State are not yet separated.Moreover, the fact that she wants to leave the monastic life stigmatizes the eyes of his peers and especially one of its ultimate parent.One can not help but be struck by the harshness of what happens to this girl, who though very pious, does not feel absolutely not made for that life.A small book that reads quickly, and although reflecting out of fashion manners, leaves a lasting impression ...

  • Rebecca McNutt
    2019-06-21 21:00

    The Nun tells the story of a woman forced into convent life by her family. This classic book, set in France, gives readers an accurate, vivid and at times frightening glimpse of the past.

  • Jim
    2019-06-25 19:40

    The story of Denis Diderot's The Nun started life as a practical joke on the Marquis whose name is mentioned in the first paragraph. But the more that Diderot looked at it, the more he thought there was a good work of fiction there.It was rather shameful how young women were locked up in cloistered nunneries because (1) their families were poor and (2) the young women in question were not legitimate. Diderot's Sister Sainte-Suzanne is a case which could conceivably happen. Her second convent was run by a sadist; and her third, by a lesbian. Eventually Suzanne manages to escape, but the author deliberately leaves the ending open.

  • Hameed Younis
    2019-06-05 22:48

    (La Religieuse) ممكن اختصار رواية الراهبة تحفة فنية على شكل كلمات وحروف ربما قد كتبت الرواية قبل اربعة قرون من الآن، ألا انها لازالت تحتفظ بنضارتها وشبابها كأنها حفيدة هذه اللحظات. كتاب ساحر، غني وصادق، يتحدث عن طفلة بريئة ادخلت قسراً للدير واضحت سجينة قوانين وقواعد وعذابات، واضحت الطفلة سجينة التعذيب الجسدي والفروض القسرية والاغراءات غير المرغوب بهاكتاب مثالي لحقة القرن السابع عشر... ديني واخلاقي وعميق... شكراً للسيدة روز مخلوف على هذه الترجمة البديعة

  • عمر عبدالفتاح
    2019-06-03 20:48

    عجيب جدا !كيف يمكن أن يوجد كل هذا الشر في مكان، يفترض أنه للعبادة ونقاء الروحبل كيف يمكن أن تحمل كل هذا الشر والانحراف الأخلاقي والفكري وسوء الطويّة أنفساً يفترض أنها نذرت حالها للطاعة والعفّة والفقر (كما يقولون) !سوزان سيمونان فتاة نقية متصالحة مع نفسها متسامحة مع غيرها (كما أحب أن أصفها)أرسلها والداها إلي الدير رغما عنها -فهي لا تميل لحياة الرهبنة (بتاتا)- ، لتكتشف فيما بعد أن هذا العمل كان نتاج خطيئة ارتكبتها والدتها وتحاول أن تكفر عنها عن طريق ابنتها لتستقر الأسرة -لأن أحدا من الأسرة لا يعلم بهذه الخطيئة- ولتكون (سوزان) سببا في أن يغفر الله للأم خطيئتها، وهذا هو السبب نفسه الذي أدّي فيما بعد لأن تنذر نفسها للرهبنة -أيضا رغما عنها- !تتنقل الفتاة الصغيرة بين ثلاثة أديرة، لاأذكر شيئا للأسف عن الدير الأول - وهذه إحدي مساوئ القراءة بالمواصلات- ! :Dوالذي انتقلت منه للدير الذي كان ممكنا أن يكون هو الأفضل لها لولا وفاة رئيسته وقدوم رئيسة جديدة هي الشر بعينه لتصبح صفحات هذا الجزء من الرواية هي الأصعب علي القارئ، وكما في مقدمة الرواية "قراءة هذا الفصل تكاد تكون لا تحتمل : تلك الشيطانات -الراهبات !- يقشعر منهن البدن"تُرحم المسكينة من هذا الدير لتنتقل إلي الدير الثالث الذي هو جنة مقارنة بالجحيم الذي قبله، أغدقت عليها رئيسة الدير محبتها بل (أسرفت) في ذلك مما أدّي لتعاسة الجميع في النهاية بما فيهم سوزان والرئيسة (كاتب المقدمة لا يري فيما حدث في بعض صفحات هذا الجزء من الرواية أنه انحراف أخلاقي وسلوكي فظيع، وأخالفه بالطبع !)، كان علي إثره وفاة رئيسة الدير وهروب الفتاة التي يأست من محاولة إبطال نذورهاتحكي سوزان في رسالة طويلة -هي رواية الراهبة- للسيد دي كرواسمار -والذي ستعرفون من هو في أول صفحة من الرواية- أحداث قصتها إلى أن هربت من الدير الثالث طالبة منه إنقاذها، فهي يتم البحث عنها لإعادتها للدير كي تعاقب على هربها بالحبس في سجن الدير طوال حياتها . .نهاية الرواية صادمة بكل ما للكلمة من معنى، لكن أثرها لم يكن سلبيا بالنسبة لي :)رواية أكثر من رائعة ، تحوي الكثير من الألم ، وتلقي الضوء علي عالم لم أكن أعرفه من قبل :)

  • Alex
    2019-06-15 20:40

    Doesn't get into the hot girl-on-girl action 'til like halfway through the book, and then it's super not hot. If you're looking for hot 18th-century girl on girl action, you gotta go with Fanny Hill. It's pleasant and enjoyable to read. I think one problem with The Nun is that I read it right after The Monk, which is way awesomer. If you're only going to read one blasphemous 18th-century lit book this ear, it has to be The Monk, and you can put that on your movie posters.So, yeah, there you go. Better evil clergy in The Monk; better lesbian sex in Fanny Hill. The Nun: fine.

  • Dams Naima
    2019-06-05 23:02

    Ces aveux attendrissants dépeignent le monastère tout en jetant des éclairages sur la détresse de ses religieuses et les empiétements de ses supérieures despotiques. Ils focalisent notre intérêt sur le combat de Suzanne Simonin pour fuir la vie conventuelle qu'elle mène à contre gré. Cette dernière n'a aucun goût pour l'état religieux qu'on lui a imposé. Il lui est contre nature car il lui contraint à refouler ses désirs, acquiescer aveuglement aux ordres des supérieures et s'enfermer à jamais dans un couvent.Ce roman-mémoire, nous éclaire sur un monde qui sombre dans le vice et la bestialité mais, se cache derrière le masque de la vertu et la chasteté: le monde des couvents français au XVIII e siècle.Sadisme, Saphisme, fanatisme religieux etc... La jeune Suzanne a tant enduré pour expier un péché commis par sa mère; celle de sa naissance. Car être un enfant adultérin, c'est être indésiré, c'est être le stigmate d'une passion interdite, c'est vivre pour le reste de sa vie en marge de la société.Une faute licencieuse peut-elle vous définir? Peut-elle tracer votre destin? Dans une société si malade comme celle de Suzanne, la réponse est toujours "oui"Brièvement, Le Livre est un témoignage larmoyant d'une religieuse malgré elle. Il est un aveu de l'injustice d'une société qui macère dans l'ignorance et la superstition. Une société qui ressemble à la nôtre.

  • Els
    2019-06-07 23:50

    Narrado en primera persona, Suzanne describe su situación criticando la forma como la sociedad determinaba el futuro de los mujeres." Reflexione señorita; es preciso o entrar para siempre en esta casa o ir a algún convento de provincia en el que será usted recibida por una módica pensión y del que no saldrá usted hasta la muerte de sus padres, que aún puede hacerse esperar mucho tiempo..."

  • Jose Moa
    2019-06-01 21:47

    We have to see The Nun in its historical context in the Enlightement age,Denis Diderot a main autor in this time,a enciclopedist that as others put in question allstablished dogmas and ideas.This novel is a hard critic to the life in the totally closed convents and the abuse of to forcé Young girls to be nuns closed all hers life against hers will,also is a critic to the religious fanatism and intolerance yet not the own christyan creences,only to part of the catholic stablishment.The novel tells in first person in form of a long letter begging help ,the life of Sor Suzanne in the convent,the pressions ,torture and cruel abusses suffered by her decissión of get out, also the power relations inside and the existence of homosexual relations (this is a feature of all closed institutions be a convent a jail or a asylum) and the remorse for this facts (the catholic church ever have had a ill obsesion with the sexuality,i dont know exactly why);Sor Suzanne is a heroine with strong personality and ideas(yet being a fervorous believer) that only search reach her own freedom and fate against all impediments with an awesome strongness.By all this, a scandalous novel till not long ago, and by obvious reasons only recently accesible in Spain as many others (this could be matter for a whole book)

  • Ryan Lieske
    2019-06-24 19:56

    Published over two hundred years ago, I can only imagine what kind of uproar and scandal it must've caused, because it's still pretty caustic and racy, even by today's standards. Telling the sad story of a young woman forced into a convent, Diderot takes aim at organized religion and the social stigmas of his time. The violence, both physical and emotional, is brutal. And Diderot doesn't shy away from frank depictions of lesbianism. While on the surface the book is certainly aiming to shock, there's a lot going on beneath the surface, particularly a strong, feminist polemic that was centuries ahead of its time. Though certainly anti-religious, it's never anti-God, which I found refreshing. Yes, the ending does feel a bit rushed, and at times, the prose does get a bit dense. But it maintains strong momentum and characterization throughout. Von Trier's "Dancer in the Dark" came to mind a lot while reading this. I would definitely love to see what he could do with this material.

  • Paula W
    2019-06-20 16:58

    This was surprisingly good, considering it was not originally written to be published as a novel but written in epistolary style by the author pretending to be a distressed nun in order to play a practical joke on someone. Because of that, I can forgive a lot of things of which I would normally be critical in a book. The things that were good, though, were really good. It reads more easily than I thought it would for something written in the 1700s. I had a great time reading it, and I think I might have quite liked it.

  • Rosa Ramôa
    2019-06-12 20:52

    Forçar vocações é anti natural...

  • Pierre E. Loignon
    2019-05-29 19:48

    Diderot, c’est pour moi l’écrivain aventurier, l’écrivain de la liberté pure, toujours en mouvement, toujours vif et brillant. Il joue dans l’écriture avec une liberté admirable, toujours rempli de surprises, il aborde tout avec la même légèreté triomphante.Il va de soi qu’un individu de ce type est très difficile à saisir car sa liberté l’entraîne toujours à explorer de nouvelles possibilités d’existences. Il a ainsi la réputation d’avoir été un matérialiste athée alors qu’il me paraît généralement plutôt comme un déiste préromantique à la Rousseau et qu’il se montre ici comme un authentique chrétien anti-clérical dans un écrit dont le bouillant Martin Luther lui-même se serait probablement délecté. L’institution clérical est en effet exposée d’une manière très réaliste par Diderot dans La religieuse sans que la foi chrétienne authentique y soit attaquée d’aucune manière, bien au contraire. Tout le roman tient dans cette phrase : « Ah! Monsieur, si vous avez des enfants, apprenez par mon sort celui que vous leur préparez, si vous souffrez qu’ils entrent en religion sans les marques de la vocation la plus forte et la plus décidée. »(91) Du début à la fin du roman, l’institution cherchera à s’imposer à la petite fille qui deviendra malgré elle sœur Sainte-Suzanne et cette dernière résistera irréductiblement, car elle a besoin d’exister librement. Elle résistera, bien que son cœur appartienne véritablement au Dieu chrétien avec qui elle a une relation personnelle. C’est même dans les vérités de cette religion qu’elle trouvera le courage et les raisons de résister à l’institution :« Ce fut alors que je sentis la supériorité de la religion chrétienne sur toutes les religions du monde; quelle profonde sagesse il y avait dans ce que l’aveugle philosophie appelle la folie de la croix. ... Je voyais l’innocent, le flanc percé, le front couronné d’épines, les mains et les pieds percés de clous, et expirant dans les souffrances; et je me disais : « Voilà mon Dieu, et j’ose me plaindre!... » Je m’attachai à cette idée, et je sentis la consolation renaître dans mon cœur ».(99)Sur le plan de l’écriture, j’ai beaucoup aimé le fait que Diderot fasse écrire ce roman par la religieuse elle-même, et qu’il la fasse interpeller fréquemment son lecteur, « vous l’avouerai-je, monsieur? », « dont vous jugerez, monsieur, comme il vous plaira », « sauf votre meilleur avis », etc. Cela donne une tournure militante au roman. Il est vraiment dommage que Diderot se mette à lui faire apostropher une personne précise à partir du milieu du roman (« Vous fûtes de ce nombre »(93)). Évidemment, il s’agit d’une histoire vraie arrivée dans le cercle de ses amis, mais il aurait pu donner une portée universelle à cette histoire particulière si il avait simplement su tenir le cap qu’il a si bien tenu dans la première partie du roman.Il arrive aussi assez souvent qu’en cours de récit, la simplicité de ton de la religieuse laisse place à un discours d’une précision philosophique qui ne colle absolument pas au personnage. Et comme la religieuse est elle-même narratrice, il n’est pas possible à Diderot d’intercaler un « dit-elle à en termes plus simples » ou un « voilà, en résumé, ce qu’elle fit comprendre à sa supérieure » pour bien faire passer ces incongruités d’expression.Le roman comporte donc quelques défauts, mais ces défauts peuvent être pardonnés si on considère qu’ils n’existeraient pas si l’excellence du reste ne les ferait pas remarquer. Et, peut-on exiger de la liberté pure qu’elle se conforme totalement à la position qu’elle s’amuse à prendre?

  • سمارا البياتي
    2019-06-20 20:45

    رواية فرنسية حقيقية لراهبة أُجبرت على الالتحاق بالدير ونذر حياتها للرهبنة دون إرادة منها فأصبحت قصتها الأليمة حديث الصالونات الآدبية طوال عام 1758.من أروع كتابات ديدرو الذي كان من أبرز مفكري فرنسا وفلاسفتها ومعاصرآ لجان جاك روسو وأقرب أصدقائه، من مؤلفاته حلي فاضحة التي تم بيعها في الخفاء ورسالة عن العميان التي سجن بسببها في دونجون ثم قصر فنسين.نشرت الرواية بعد موته بستة عشر عامآ في عهد الثورة الفرنسية ثم أحرقت علننآ بناءآ على أمر من محكمة السين.الرواية هي يوميات مخلوقة بريئة جميلة مرهفة وغاية في الورع ولكن دون أي ميل لحياة الرهبنة، كانت في السادسة عشر والنصف عندما قرر والديها أرسالها الى الدير بقسوة ووحشية أنسانية لأنها في الواقع طفلة غير شرعية وشهادة رهيبة ضد برجوازية العصر لا دخل للدين فيها.تمضي مدة قصيرة في الدير الأول ثم تنتقل الى دير لونشان وهو معسكر اعتقال ديني، قراءة هذا الفصل تكاد تكون لاتحتمل، تلك الشيطانات الراهبات يقشعر البدن من ميلهن للأذى والسادية التي لا تغيب عن الكثير من دور الرهبنة.كانت شجاعة وقوية ولكن لم تصمد كثيرآ أمام تلك المحن الطويلة والقاسية فأنهد جسمها النحيف وسقطت في الغم والاكتئاب، لاشيء يصمد أمام الهجر والوحدة والاضطهاد.في أحدى أعترافاتها لمرشدها تقول:ثمة سؤال ياسيدي يجب أن أطرحه: لماذا من بين كل الأفكار المشؤومة التي تعبر رأس راهبة يائسة لم تخطر لها قط فكرة إضرام النار في الدير؟ثم تمتم: أية آمال يمكن أن ترجوها راهبة؟فيجيبها: الأمل بأن تجدِ الأبواب مفتوحة ذات يوم، وبأن يتخلى البشر عن العبث بحبس مخلوقات فتية تضج بالحياة في القبور. الأمل بأن تُلغى الأديرة، بأن تشتغل النيران فيها وتنهار أسوارها.ثم تنتقل الى دير ثالث، كانت سعيدة وبريئة للغاية لدرجة أنها لم تفهم ما كان يحدق بها من خطر ساحق حتى أخبرها المرشد الذي تعترف اليه، فأنقلب الحال وهربت من الدير. كانت تلك روايتي الثانية بعد طيور الشوك The Thorn Birds التي صارت فيما بعد عملآ فنيآ ضخمآ أشتهر عالميآ، والتي تعبر بشفافية صارخة وألم عميق عن معاناة الراهب وعذاباته الصامتة.

  • Theut
    2019-06-05 18:01

    Romanzo di denuncia (almeno in parte) delle condizioni, simili alla prigionia, all'interno dei conventi, soprattutto quando chi vi entra è costretto dalla famiglia o dalle circostanze. In molte parti la critica si fa generale e trascende la protagonista.Cosa non mi è piaciuto del tutto: l'atmosfera morbosa del secondo monastero e l'insistenza su certi dettagli.A quale circostanza questo libro sarà per sempre legato: comprato usato in una libreria (abbastanza lontana da casa) in cui non ero mai stata, decido di leggerlo subito. Mi accorgo di un cognome conosciuto nell'ex libris (che riporta anche il posto in cui abito). In breve si tratta di una persona che è mancata e i cui libri sono stati venduti. Questo tornerà a breve al cugino di questa persona.

  • El
    2019-06-09 21:05

    This deserves a good ol' fashioned, "Dirty!"This practical-joke-turned-novel is an exceptionally accessible eighteenth-century novel about a young woman, a product of her mother's infidelity, who is forced into a convent. The overwhelming descriptions of her time spent in the convent with the other nuns is enough to turn one from Christianity, so powerful are the images of sadistic behavior. Quite racy for being written in 1760.I always knew I would make a really bad nun. But it was Diderot who was finally able to verbalize exactly why. I will now forever connect convents with horror-movie-mental-hospitals. Religion is scary!